Alguns e-mails com pontuação alta são transmitidos para as caixas de correio dos usuários, mesmo que muitas das mesmas mensagens de spam sejam filtradas corretamente para a caixa de spambox do servidor. Aqui está um exemplo: Correio filtrado corretamente como spam
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 15:08:33 +0300 From: Erich Gibbs
<[email protected]> To: **** <*****@****.**> Subject: please
sign
[-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: multipart/related, Encoding: 7bit,
Size: 16K --]
[-- Attachment #1 --] [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: 8bit, Size: 0.1K
--]
Dear ****
Please sign the receipt attached for the arrival of new office
facilities.
Best regards, Erich Gibbs
[-- Attachment #2: fe12f845f8ff.zip --] [-- Type: application/zip,
Encoding: base64, Size: 15K --]
[-- application/zip is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --]
[-- Attachment #2: SpamAssassinReport.txt --] [-- Type: text/plain,
Encoding: 7bit, Size: 1.0K --]
Spam detection software, running on the system "****.****.**", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future
email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that
system for details.
Content preview: Dear **** Please sign the receipt attached for the
arrival of new office facilities. Best regards, Erich Gibbs [...]
Content analysis details: (5.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.9 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (Split
IP)
0.2 CK_HELO_GENERIC Relay used name indicative of a Dynamic Pool or
Generic rPTR
0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address
0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
Aqui está uma mensagem semelhante que chegou à minha caixa de entrada
Return-Path: <[email protected]> Received: from
108.subnet110-136-45.speedy.telkom.net.id (108.subnet110-136-45.speedy.telkom.net.id [110.136.45.108] (may be
forged)) by (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u74CAuvv038162
for <****@****.**>; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:11:07 +0200 Received: from
root by telkom.net.id with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from
<[email protected]>) id
kcxAKb-MGbTTg-NC for ****@****.**; Thu, 04 Aug 2016 19:10:52 +0700
To: "*****" <****@****.**> Subject: please sign Date: Thu, 04 Aug
2016 19:10:52 +0700 From: "Earlene Blankenship"
<[email protected]> Message-ID:
<[email protected]> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version:
1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="text/html"; boundary="b1_560b0ac54766d9148a54052f9a46e5ef" X-SPF-Scan-By: smf-spf
v2.0.2 - http://smfs.sf.net/ Received-SPF: None (****.****.**: domain
of [email protected] does not designate permitted
sender hosts) receiver=****.****.**; client-ip=110.136.45.108;
envelope-from=<[email protected]>;
helo=108.subnet110-136-45.speedy.telkom.net.id; X-Virus-Scanned:
clamav-milter 0.99.2 at ****.****.** X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 62.168.116.66
--b1_560b0ac54766d9148a54052f9a46e5ef Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dear ****
Please sign the receipt attached for the arrival of new office
facilities.
Best regards, Earlene Blankenship
1_560b0ac54766d9148a54052f9a46e5ef Content-Type: application/zip; name="d8bc18159378.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="d8bc18159378.zip"
Quando eu verifico a pontuação da mesma mensagem com spamc, a pontuação é alta. Não sei porque não está sinalizado corretamente antes da entrega.
# spamc -R <'1470312683.38275_0.****.****.**:2,Sa'
8.3/5.0 Spam detection software, running on the system "****.****.**", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar
future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of
that system for details.
Content preview: Dear servis Please sign the receipt attached for the
arrival of new office facilities. Best regards, Earlene Blankenship
[...]
Content analysis details: (8.3 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
2.9 HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname (Split
IP)
0.0 CK_HELO_DYNAMIC_SPLIT_IP Relay HELO'd using suspicious hostname
(Split IP)
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[110.136.45.108 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[110.136.45.108 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
-1.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
#
Alguma idéia do que pode ser a causa? Obrigado.
Eu encontrei a causa. Em mimedefang-filter foi definido que apenas mensagens menores que 100kB são processadas por spamassassin. Eu levantei a barra para 300kB e o problema está resolvido.
if ($Features{"SpamAssassin"}) {
if (-s "./INPUTMSG" < 300*1024) {
...
Espero que isso ajude alguém.
Tags spamassassin