Eu tento mover uma VM do VirtualBox para uma imagem de encaixe. Usamos o VirtualBox para cruzar o código-fonte de um dispositivo armhf (algo baseado em um BeagleBone)
Eu tenho problemas em RUN apt-get install -y build-essential:armhf
O código completo do Docker é semelhante ao seguinte:
FROM debian:jessie
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get upgrade
RUN apt-get install -y build-essential module-assistant curl git cmake
RUN curl http://emdebian.org/tools/debian/emdebian-toolchain-archive.key | apt-key add -
RUN echo "deb http://emdebian.org/tools/debian jessie main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/crosstools.list
RUN dpkg --add-architecture armhf
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-get install -y crossbuild-essential-armhf
RUN apt-get install -y curl:armhf
RUN apt-get install -y libcurl4-openssl-dev:armhf openssl:armhf
RUN apt-get install -y build-essential:armhf
RUN apt-get install -y libssl-dev:armhf
Eu recebo o seguinte erro ao executar o docker build:
Step 12/13 : RUN apt-get install -y build-essential:armhf
---> Running in ca5a82d30cc7
Reading package lists...
Building dependency tree...
Reading state information...
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
build-essential:armhf : Depends: gcc:armhf (>= 4:4.9.1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: g++:armhf (>= 4:4.9.1) but it is not going to be installed
Depends: make:armhf
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
The command '/bin/sh -c apt-get install -y build-essential:armhf' returned a non-zero code: 100
Se eu olhar o histórico do bash na VM, parece o mesmo. Qual é o problema com o meu código do Docker?
EDIT: Saída com -o Debug :: pkgProblemResolver = yes:
Starting pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 2
Starting 2 pkgProblemResolver with broken count: 2
Investigating (0) dpkg-dev [ amd64 ] < 1.17.27 > ( utils )
Broken dpkg-dev:amd64 Depends on make [ amd64 ] < 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:amd64 1 as a solution to dpkg-dev:amd64 2
Added make:amd64 to the remove list
Broken dpkg-dev:amd64 Depends on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to dpkg-dev:amd64 2
Added binutils:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing dpkg-dev:amd64 via keep of make:amd64
Fixing dpkg-dev:amd64 via keep of binutils:amd64
Investigating (0) binutils [ armhf ] < none -> 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Broken binutils:armhf Conflicts on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to binutils:armhf 2
Added binutils:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing binutils:armhf via remove of binutils:amd64
Investigating (0) make [ amd64 ] < 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Broken make:amd64 Conflicts on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to make:amd64 1
Added make:armhf to the remove list
Fixing make:amd64 via keep of make:armhf
Investigating (0) binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5 > ( devel )
Broken binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 Depends on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 1
Removing binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 rather than change binutils:amd64
Investigating (1) build-essential [ armhf ] < none -> 11.7 > ( devel )
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Re-Instated make:armhf
Investigating (1) dpkg-dev [ amd64 ] < 1.17.27 > ( utils )
Broken dpkg-dev:amd64 Depends on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to dpkg-dev:amd64 2
Added binutils:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing dpkg-dev:amd64 via keep of binutils:amd64
Investigating (1) gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf [ amd64 ] < 4.9.2-10 > ( devel )
Broken gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 Depends on binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5 > ( devel ) (>= 2.25)
Considering binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 1 as a solution to gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 2
Added binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 via keep of binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64
Investigating (1) binutils [ armhf ] < none -> 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Broken binutils:armhf Conflicts on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to binutils:armhf 2
Added binutils:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing binutils:armhf via remove of binutils:amd64
Investigating (1) make [ amd64 ] < 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Broken make:amd64 Conflicts on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to make:amd64 1
Added make:armhf to the remove list
Fixing make:amd64 via keep of make:armhf
Investigating (1) binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5 > ( devel )
Broken binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 Depends on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 1
Removing binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 rather than change binutils:amd64
Investigating (2) build-essential [ armhf ] < none -> 11.7 > ( devel )
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Considering make-guile:armhf -1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Re-Instated libgc1c2:armhf
Re-Instated libltdl7:armhf
Re-Instated libtinfo5:armhf
Re-Instated libncurses5:armhf
Re-Instated libreadline6:armhf
Re-Instated libunistring0:armhf
Re-Instated guile-2.0-libs:armhf
Re-Instated make-guile:armhf
Investigating (2) dpkg-dev [ amd64 ] < 1.17.27 > ( utils )
Broken dpkg-dev:amd64 Depends on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 1 as a solution to dpkg-dev:amd64 2
Added binutils:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing dpkg-dev:amd64 via keep of binutils:amd64
Investigating (2) gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf [ amd64 ] < 4.9.2-10 > ( devel )
Broken gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 Depends on binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5 > ( devel ) (>= 2.25)
Considering binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 1 as a solution to gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 2
Added binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 to the remove list
Fixing gcc-4.9-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64 via keep of binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf:amd64
Investigating (2) binutils [ armhf ] < none -> 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Broken binutils:armhf Conflicts on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 2 as a solution to binutils:armhf 2
Holding Back binutils:armhf rather than change binutils:amd64
Investigating (2) make [ amd64 ] < 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Broken make:amd64 Conflicts on make-guile [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make-guile:armhf -1 as a solution to make:amd64 1
Added make-guile:armhf to the remove list
Fixing make:amd64 via keep of make-guile:armhf
Investigating (3) build-essential [ armhf ] < none -> 11.7 > ( devel )
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Considering make-guile:armhf 1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Investigating (3) gcc-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel )
Broken gcc-4.9:armhf Depends on binutils [ armhf ] < none -> 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel ) (>= 2.25)
Considering binutils:armhf 2 as a solution to gcc-4.9:armhf 3
Holding Back gcc-4.9:armhf rather than change binutils:armhf
Investigating (3) gcc [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel )
Broken gcc:armhf Depends on gcc-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel ) (>= 4.9.2-1~)
Considering gcc-4.9:armhf 3 as a solution to gcc:armhf 1
Holding Back gcc:armhf rather than change gcc-4.9:armhf
Investigating (3) g++ [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel )
Broken g++:armhf Depends on gcc [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel ) (>= 4:4.9.2-2)
Considering gcc:armhf 1 as a solution to g++:armhf 0
Holding Back g++:armhf rather than change gcc:armhf
Investigating (3) g++-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel )
Broken g++-4.9:armhf Depends on gcc-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel ) (= 4.9.2-10)
Considering gcc-4.9:armhf 3 as a solution to g++-4.9:armhf 0
Holding Back g++-4.9:armhf rather than change gcc-4.9:armhf
Investigating (4) build-essential [ armhf ] < none -> 11.7 > ( devel )
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on gcc [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel ) (>= 4:4.9.1)
Considering gcc:armhf 1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Re-Instated binutils:armhf
Re-Instated gcc-4.9:armhf
Re-Instated gcc:armhf
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on g++ [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel ) (>= 4:4.9.1)
Considering g++:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Re-Instated g++-4.9:armhf
Re-Instated g++:armhf
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Considering make-guile:armhf 1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Investigating (4) binutils [ armhf ] < none -> 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Broken binutils:armhf Conflicts on binutils [ amd64 ] < 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel )
Considering binutils:amd64 2 as a solution to binutils:armhf 2
Holding Back binutils:armhf rather than change binutils:amd64
Investigating (5) build-essential [ armhf ] < none -> 11.7 > ( devel )
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Considering make-guile:armhf 1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Investigating (5) gcc-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel )
Broken gcc-4.9:armhf Depends on binutils [ armhf ] < none -> 2.25-5+deb8u1 > ( devel ) (>= 2.25)
Considering binutils:armhf 2 as a solution to gcc-4.9:armhf 3
Holding Back gcc-4.9:armhf rather than change binutils:armhf
Investigating (5) gcc [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel )
Broken gcc:armhf Depends on gcc-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel ) (>= 4.9.2-1~)
Considering gcc-4.9:armhf 3 as a solution to gcc:armhf 1
Holding Back gcc:armhf rather than change gcc-4.9:armhf
Investigating (5) g++ [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel )
Broken g++:armhf Depends on gcc [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel ) (>= 4:4.9.2-2)
Considering gcc:armhf 1 as a solution to g++:armhf 0
Holding Back g++:armhf rather than change gcc:armhf
Investigating (5) g++-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel )
Broken g++-4.9:armhf Depends on gcc-4.9 [ armhf ] < none -> 4.9.2-10 > ( devel ) (= 4.9.2-10)
Considering gcc-4.9:armhf 3 as a solution to g++-4.9:armhf 0
Holding Back g++-4.9:armhf rather than change gcc-4.9:armhf
Investigating (6) build-essential [ armhf ] < none -> 11.7 > ( devel )
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on gcc [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel ) (>= 4:4.9.1)
Considering gcc:armhf 1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on g++ [ armhf ] < none -> 4:4.9.2-2 > ( devel ) (>= 4:4.9.1)
Considering g++:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Broken build-essential:armhf Depends on make [ armhf ] < none -> 4.0-8.1 > ( devel )
Considering make:armhf 0 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Considering make-guile:armhf 1 as a solution to build-essential:armhf 9999
Done
Parece que há algumas dependências que não podem ser instaladas. O que exatamente é difícil dizer?
Infelizmente, a saída de apt não é muito útil quando encontra um problema que não pode ser corrigido. Você pode persuadi-lo a gerar mais resultados - especificando -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes na linha de comando do apt. Isso deve lhe dar mais detalhes sobre o que está tentando fazer e, esperamos, permitir que você corrija isso.
Se isso não resolver o problema, execute o apt com essa opção e poste a saída.