Uma exceção de verificação de máquina é um problema de hardware - a CPU lançou uma interrupção indicando que o estado interno é isn ' t válido. Meu palpite, dado que o chip estava sendo sobrecarregado, é que pelo menos uma parte do seu chip está danificada.
I have read that the i7 950 does not like DRAM voltages past 1.65, but that they are acceptable if they are within .5 of the BLCK setting.
Reverta para as tensões de estoque e veja se isso persiste. Do meu ponto de vista, o i7 frita rapidamente, empurrando-o para além de 1,65 - esse limite é devido às tensões de ruptura dos transistores dentro do controlador de memória do i7.
Infelizmente para mim isso soa como um chip danificado: (
EDIT: De Anandtech : (Ênfase minha)
Exactly what the impact to the processor will be is dependent upon several factors. Put simply, if you go crazy with VDimm, let’s say around 2.0V~2.2V without additional tuning, then expect to greatly reduce the processor lifespan to a few weeks or maybe days. We have already witnessed several CPUs being damaged or destroyed at the motherboard partners with high VDimm settings, especially those that ran at 2.0V or higher with base settings. By base settings, we mean configuring an i7/X58 platform in the same manner a typical user now sets up a Penryn/X48 DDR3 platform. The rules have changed completely for Intel, just we cannot discuss the playbook at this time (hey, it is frustrating for us also).
Likewise, we have seen high VCore/VDimm test beds operate without a problem for benchmarking purposes (yet still fail with long-term bench testing) provided a multitude of BIOS settings for the core, DIMM, IMC, Uncore, and QPI selections were properly set. The base secret (there are more) is maintaining correct amplitude levels, something we will discuss at product launch. For now, high VDimm is not necessarily the true problem here, but it is the quickest way to damage/destroy an i7 if the rest of the system is not properly tuned.